

Related Articles
Senior Cricketers Yuvraj, Sehwag, Harbhajan, Gambhir and Zaheer missing for World Cup 2015 sqaud
Surprisingly senior Cricketing heroes of 2011 World seem to be left out of Indian Sqaud including Virendra Sehwag, Yuvraj Singh, Gautam Gambhir, Harbhajan Singh and Zaheer Khan from 30-man probables list for 2015 World Cup. MS Dhoni, Virat Kohli, Suresh Raina and R Ashwin finds place in the squad out of 2011 World Cup winning […]
Controversy in GPSC exam for Class 3 posts
Again GPSC exam for Class 3 posts has created controversy after use of unconstitutional word which is prohibited by Supreme Court of India. In today’s exam the prohibited word was used in a question paper. Dalit and opposition leaders feels hurt with use of banned word by Supreme Court in question paper. They slammed BJP […]
Barack Obama enthusiastic about prospect of greater Indo-US ties: White House
US President Barack Obama, is very enthusiastic about the prospect of increased Indo-US collaboration, economic growth for American companies and investments in India, the White House has said. “Generally speaking, in terms of the US-India partnership, which you’ve referenced, the President is very enthusiastic about the prospect of increased collaboration, increased economic growth for American […]





The Supreme Court on Monday upheld the constitutional validity of the SC/ST Amendment Act, 2018, and said a court can grant anticipatory bail only in cases where a prima facie case is not made out.
A bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra said a preliminary inquiry is not essential before lodging an FIR under the act and the approval of senior police officials is not needed.
Justice Ravindra Bhat, the other member of the bench, said in a concurring verdict that every citizen needs to treat fellow citizens equally and foster the concept of fraternity.
Justice Bhat said a court can quash the FIR if a prima facie case is not made out under the SC/ST Act and the liberal use of anticipatory bail will defeat the intention of Parliament.
The top court’s verdict came on a batch of PILs challenging the validity of the SC/ST Amendment Act of 2018, which was brought to nullify the effect of the apex court’s 2018 ruling, which had diluted the provisions of the stringent Act.