

Related Articles
Ahmedabad: one more car accident with rash driving at Shivranjani
People practice drunk and drive or do rash driving but it is certain that in Ahmedabad city, cases of rash driving are on rise. Last night one car driver in unbelievable accident near Shivranjani Cross Road dashed into the basement around 1:15 hrs. The car accident took place on the opposite of AB Jewellers Showroom […]
BanasKantha:Panthaawada to observe Bandh on Saturday in protest of Toll Tax at Kunchaawada
In BanasKantha district, Panthaawada to observe Bandh on Saturday in protest of Toll Tax at Kunchaawada. Toll Tax Redressal Group has announced Bandh after 3 days long protest.
BRDS Interior Design Exhibition 2024 showcased over 500 innovative interior products
The Biggest Interior Design Exhibition of Ahmedabad showcased over 500 innovative interior products along with top interior design universities and brands of India BRDS Interior Design Exhibition 2024, presented by annual exhibition that showcased the latest interior trends and technology in home and commercial spaces. This exhibition served as a medium of opportunity for both […]





The Supreme Court on Monday upheld the constitutional validity of the SC/ST Amendment Act, 2018, and said a court can grant anticipatory bail only in cases where a prima facie case is not made out.
A bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra said a preliminary inquiry is not essential before lodging an FIR under the act and the approval of senior police officials is not needed.
Justice Ravindra Bhat, the other member of the bench, said in a concurring verdict that every citizen needs to treat fellow citizens equally and foster the concept of fraternity.
Justice Bhat said a court can quash the FIR if a prima facie case is not made out under the SC/ST Act and the liberal use of anticipatory bail will defeat the intention of Parliament.
The top court’s verdict came on a batch of PILs challenging the validity of the SC/ST Amendment Act of 2018, which was brought to nullify the effect of the apex court’s 2018 ruling, which had diluted the provisions of the stringent Act.